![]() ![]() Everyone is taught their times tables the same month (whether they are ready for them or not, or whether they had already mastered them or not). Everyone gets the same number of minutes of reading instruction utilizing the same book (whether they need it or not, or whether they are ready for it or not). identically, whether justified or not, whether necessary or not, whether appropriate or not. But in practice, this comes out as essentially treating all students the same, i.e. It is a core principle we’ve all grown up on it is ingrained in our way of thinking. ![]() Yet in spite of our reverence for all humans being of equal value, I think we are terribly confused about what that actually means in practice, notably in the world of Education.īroadly speaking, teachers desire to treat their students equally. (Frustratingly, in many ways and in many places across our globe, each one of us being of equal value is still a bold statement even today.) Clarifying this point took a lot out of us, but we reached a just conclusion: that each of us is equal in our value as a being. “Men” means all of mankind, not just the ones who are actual men. Are black men equal, too? What about women? Of course they are. Some of those struggles have found us grappling with (what we thought at the time were) big questions. This radical-for-its-time idea had essentially never before been implemented, and the “grand experiment” that followed has wrought massive struggles and remarkable successes. It meant that the man sweeping the floor and the merchant running the business were of equal value - equal in the eyes of the law, equal in their value as humans, equal in their right and opportunity to pursue their happiness. In mathematics, the term “equal” is used when things are “equal in value,” and being equal in value is what was intended with those daring strokes of 1776. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |